This week I received a tea in the mail from a reader asking
for an assessment of a tea he was not too sure about. With some queries, I
discovered the tea was purchased on eBay from
Fengyuan Teashop, an online
retailer with obvious fakes. When you see 1990s teas selling for $40, of course
these are too good to be true. Other tea bloggers have written extensively
about puerh faking, and in this case I found a few flags. Personally, I have
found some pasted teas may be decent enough to drink. So I can always approach
a tea with at least a little hope of finding something drinkable.
|
I look nice for my age. |
The tea was listed as a “1998 Menghai Tea Factory Zhangxiang”
with Guangdong storage. The eBay seller offers a number of Hong Kong storage
teas, so initially I expected very wet storage, however the reader still had
the custom’s slip which stated Guangdong as the origin. The wrapper provided
the first flag, which is that the ink seems rather new.
Another flag is the unattached neifei. Although certainly a
neifei may detach on its own, this one has bug bites along the top. Now I’ve
had many a bug-bit wrapper, but the actual wrapper has no bug bites which it
should if the neifei looks like this. I suspect the neifei is faked or taken
from a real tea consumed long ago, and subsequently added to this beeng. Or if
you have a bug-laden warehouse, maybe all you need is to place a stack of fake
neifeis in storage and eventually the stack is bit along one side. Steaming a
bit of leaves is an easy way to attach a fake neifei.
|
One bug-bit edge, but the nei piao looks much newer. |
All the signs so far add
up to “re-wrapping,” which is a no-provenance humid tea in a copied wrapper or
even a real wrapper from a long gone tea. The nei piao appeared fresher and not
bug-bit, again another flag. I noted the nei piao had a muddy smudge along the
back corner as if someone had thumbed through a pile of them with dirty
fingers.
|
Definitely some wet storage. |
The leaves have evidence of wetter storage, but no mold and
the tea has a graphite smell which is often the case of well-aired but more
humid storage, in this case Guangdong dry, or what I’d classify as “traditional
dry” if I had no information on the storage origin. The reader said the cake
arrived in shrink wrap which is common with aged teas sold in China to keep out
humidity, preserve the tea and keep the cake from falling apart. Shrink wrap on
older tea has a certain caché, suggesting a high value tea, an easy illusion
for a fake tea to convey. Really, the storage aroma is pleasant; I like the slightly
humid and metallic odor.
|
More evidence of wetness, mushy spots. |
Not quite as enticing are the human hairs in the tea. An occasional
hair is not really a flaw in an older factory tea, but when I find three hairs I
start feeling a dirty sloppiness in the tea, and more turned off from actually
drinking it. Luckily I did not find any pubic hair, which is where I draw the
line.
|
One hair at 11:00 position. |
I brewed up 8g of tea using boiling hot water. I did not
have the courage to use a gaiwan and instead picked Yixing and pre-heated the
teapot as hot as possible. I rinsed twice and did a taste-and-spit of the two
following brews. The next brew turned out much darker, but alas the tea
completely lacks any flavor apart from a light tartness, which is a shame because
the storage flavor is quite nice. I can see the tea had some very aggressive
aging initially with at least a few years of drying. Unfortunately a slight
chemical residue is present which numbs the tongue.
|
A little tough to see, reddish hair at 4:00 position. I found a third hair in the tea I broke off. |
Otherwise the tea simply lacks any flavor at all and little
to no presence in the mouth aside from the numbing. I did not want to continue
with the tea any further at this point, and chased my single cup with a Rolaids
to sop up any unpleasantness. The wet leaves are larger and leathery and simply
did not have enough bitter juices to survive the wet storage punishment and
convert into an aged flavor. All I taste here is the fairly decent lightly wet
storage.
|
The leaves don't look bad at all, the proof is in the cup. |
I did not suffer any after effects from the tea, but this
one is a tosser. Perhaps the reader had the same thought, but tossing is
difficult and sending the tea to me is a way to defer the decision to someone
else. I will keep the tea for a bit in case the reader wants it back, but I cannot
suggest drinking it. Hopefully my friend has better teas to drink instead.
|
The tea has a nice color, a shame really. |
Looking at recent feedbacks for the online seller, I see
that most recent customers have purchased newer teas. Perhaps not all teas sold
by this vendor are bad, but real 1990s tea cannot be bought on eBay and
certainly not at the $30-40 price point I see on many of the vendor’s “old”
teas.
|
Nothing to taste here. |
Real 1990s teas are at or well over $200 on the low end, and very scarce now. Luckily this particular tea is no longer for sale in the vendor shop, but I would not be surprised to see it "miraculously" appear for sale again someday.
Hi Cwyn,
ReplyDeleteplease please please review this tea
https://teabook.myshopify.com/collections/shop/products/limited-edition-premium-agarwood-ripe-puerh
Should be good for a laugh. I think it is for real, a bit late for April Fools.
In anticipation.....